There is internal and external happiness. We’ve recognised that external happiness is what we can call high maintenance and internal happiness is what we call contentment, happybell low maintenance.
We’ve come to recognise that the laws of nature help people find contentment and therefore happiness that is not vulnerable. We’ve seen that sometimes the most successful and the most attractive people are the most internally unhappy because they are seeking what is missing and they are seeking a in every place possible. wealth4living
Our ego is designed to look after our happiness. If we are unhappy it protects us, if we are wrong it defends us, if we are in pain it seeks pleasure. So our ego can achieve many things including happiness but this is all external, high maintenance and short lived. Sustainable happiness comes from the inside before the ego has a chance to play with it. instafinanz
Self leadership
Given that we spend so much of our lives at work it’s wise to examine the cause of happiness at work.
Achievement and success do not have to come at the cost of personal happiness. Given that both are conditional on self leadership this is where we’ll start. sabkobol
7 levels of happiness
It comes as a significant surprise to people that happiness and success are linked. As we’ve discussed in previous articles there are short-term home4cloud causes of happiness and long-term. We’ve seen that short-term causes are high maintenance and very vulnerable and we’ve seen that long-term causes of happiness don’t necessarily make you laugh.
We don’t have the time to go through each of the 7 levels of happiness. So, I will give you the scale and you can interpret the gradations in between. At the bottom of the scale, short-term happiness are things that we perceive we have got to have. I guess in another language this can be called security: a roof over our head, food on the table, health and support. And although these things make us happy once we have them they don’t.
At the other end of the scale is love. Doing what you love and loving what you do.
So you can see two people doing the same job can approach it from diametrically opposite directions. One can perceive that the job is fulfilling their “got to” list while the other, doing exactly the same task list, may perceive that they love their work and are doing what they love.
Happiness varies with approach – Free will and leadership
Every human being has the right to think for themselves and therefore perceive their work as they choose. Bullying is inappropriate and so we can’t force people to perceive things the way we want. We can try all sorts of tricks such as bonus schemes and parties but at the end of the day it’s people’s private life that impacts their work-life and we have no control over that.
As a consequence of this huge resources are wasted trying to cause happiness in work. I have been in the industry of human development for 35 years and I know that when a person chooses to resist change and hold onto their perceptions and lifestyle habits, no matter how unhealthy, Casino enligne they do so with great enthusiasm.
So often in business we misinterpret our power over others as a leader. We really don’t have much control. We can influence emotions, we can motivate people and we can cause the working environment to be good, however we cannot change another person’s consciousness and this is where the problem begins.
I was born with a consciousness of a peanut. Through a lot of trial and error and many mistakes and hard work I have changed that consciousness. My happiness has improved dramatically but my productivity hasn’t changed much at all. Simply, this means that an extremely unconscious person can bring results in business in just the same way as a conscious person the only difference is the well-being, happiness and private life.
Work-based relationships
More than 50% of the energy spent in the workplace is spent dealing with things that are absolutely tangential to the productivity of the individual. Everybody is trying to be their best based on their perception of what will make them happy. Because there is a range of definitions of happiness, the 7 levels, there is infinite opportunity for misalignment in process. This leads to overt and covert sabotage.
99% of all conversations I hold with leaders are about people they cannot manage. Now this is not a reflection on poor leadership but a reflection of compassion and idealism.
Firstly there is a premise that people can be changed. This is wrong. Secondly, Chicago Moving Company there is a premise that tolerance of behaviour that is counter-productive to results will eventually cause people to be thankful and therefore change their behaviour. Again this is wrong.
